Major and minor elemental trends of gypsum-ghost limestones of the Osiek-Baranów Sandomierski native sulphur deposit (northern Carpathian Foredeep, Poland): implications for limestones genesis

Authors

  • Andrzej Gąsiewicz Polish Geological Institute - National Research Institute, Rakowiecka 4, PL-00-975 Warszawa, Poland

Keywords:

Carpathian Foredeep, Badenian, native sulphur deposits, gypsum-ghost limestones

Abstract

The Middle Miocene (middle Badenian) "gypsum-ghost" limestones composed of calcite and/or sulphur pseudomorphs after selenitic gypsum, are a salient feature of the Polish sulphur deposits from the northern Carpathian Foredeep (S. Poland). Sulphurous rocks (including the gypsum-ghost limestones) are present within the evaporite unit, the so-called "Chemical Series", and are commonly believed to be lithological equivalents of synchronous gypsum deposits, resulting from regionally extensive, wholesale replacement of the selenite lithofacies by limestones and limestone + native sulphur. However, detailed geochemical examination of regional major and minor element compositions in these unusual carbonates suggests considerable internal differences. Distinct variations in chemical distribution along the main development of the Osiek-Baranów Sandomierski native sulphur deposit, together with the associated barren limestone areas, are clearly recognized. The pattern of the geochemical parameters of these gypsum-ghost limestones is inconsistent with an epigenetic model of formation of the Polish sulphur deposits (wholesale replacement of sulphate deposits by carbonates + native sulphur) and argues for their formation within a sedimentary-early diagenetic regime.

Downloads

Published

2011-02-16

Issue

Vol. 54 No. 4 (2010)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and more frequent citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).